Well, it is not quite that simple but I figured maybe a bold and obnoxious headline was due for this little tidbit. First, I do need to say that Ontario made it exceedingly difficult for even those with SRS to change a birth certificate but this decision by the Ontario HRC takes it too far. I may be in error here but I do believe transsexuals have had to deal Zucker and his ilk in Toronto if young so they deserve a merit badge for that.
The Commission handed done its decision on April 11, 20012 and the Government of Ontario has 180 days in which to reply with a new and improved process which I assume must allow females to have a penis. I do believe under Canadian Government Law they could pass another law that redefines the process and keeps the requirement of SRS but that is not something I am 100% sure of.
It is ironic that this Gay and Lesbian paper responded with such glee considering many of the lesbian women they represent find the thought of a lesbian with a functional penis obnoxious. As can be seen from this article this was a concerted effort by a Trans Activist group, seen in a photo, that represented the transgender point of view and nothing else. What a bevy of beauties that is and I do wonder how many a packing a penis and yes that was meant to be nasty if anyone has a doubt.
Like Autumn Sandeen the complainant had a bilateral orchiectomy because she got sick from the anti androgen blockers. Since Ontario has supposedly resumed paying for SRS it is apparent that the complainant has no intention of ever having SRS and in fact in a statement to a Psychiatrist stated she wanted to transition without any hormones or medications which I find odd but then I rarely trust what Psychiatrists say.
If you happen to read the entire decision like I did you will find something very interesting. The only time transsexual is mentioned is generally when saying "transsexual surgery" and in all cases this was identified as a transgender case and a case concerning gender identity and gender expression and the primary mantra of the Transgender Borg that a female can have a penis.
This is the problem with Commissions and in particular Human Rights Commissions because they almost always are populated by very liberal people or despots like Gaddafi whose government was elected to the UN Human Rights Commission. This same HRC just praised Gadaffi as is pointed out in this article about such nonsensical praise from an HRC.
I am not in any way making the assertion that the Ontario HRC is this stupid but logic is not their bailiwick. A female does not have a penis and by changing a birth certificate that is what they are defining female as. In fact I guess the birth certificate no longer defines ones sex characteristics at all.
I guess the question I have is who is on the commission and what is their agenda? The other issue was this came about because of the difficulty even transsexuals with SRS had in changing their birth certificates in Ontario and I wonder how much that had to do with Zucker and his clinic or even if it did.
The other problem is simple. If this stands then it is another reason why transsexualism will never be recognized as a medical condition but then that has always been the position of the Transgender Borg. IF a transsexual can be cured then what the heck is someone that identifies as transgender? Certainly there wish is to be recognized as female with a penis which denigrates every female in the world but then men do not like to be denied their fantasies.