Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Being Transgender is a Blessing?

Just when I thought it could not get any clearer why those born transsexual are different from the Transgender penis keepers  Monica Roberts (MR)provides the ammunition. In an earlier post called "I Repeat: Stop Looking At Being Trans As A Curse" MR says the following.

It's past time that transpeople stop viewing being us as a curse.  If we want people to love and respect us, it may sound simplistic, but we have to start first with loving and respecting ourselves.  

I actually agree with MR when it concerns transvestites and gay men in a dress like her. They gain their pleasure from cross-dressing and living on the edge of society as "trans" and it clearly demonstrates why we are so unlike them and do not belong under the Transgender umbrella not that we were ever asked in the first place. One cannot love oneself when you hate your genitals because they are wrong. Benjamin said that "there is nobody as unhappy as one that is a true transsexual." MR was and is happy with the penis and balls MR was born with.

We are the wrong sex and yes our gender presentation does bother us but it is not how we dress it is what is between our legs. It is why we almost universally say we are cured after SRS, because that is the ultimate goal. People like MR gain pleasure from their penis and that is why they keep it which is strictly 100% male and has not one damn thing to do with being transsexual. The most disgusting thing is the transgender crowd with the dress and a penis claiming they are lesbian and demanding lesbians accept them and have sex with them "because" they say they are lesbian. That goes right  along with the bogus claim of being women.

The happiest day of my life was when I woke up in my room after my SRS and could not stop crying despite Harry sitting there telling me it was over. I was overcome with emotion because it really was over and I was a girl. Yes there was a lot of pain but I have a high pain threshold and it seemed so worth it. It was like this choking weight was lifted off my chest. I was free and all of my friends felt similar emotions because being born transsexual is like having a severe birth defect that prevents one from living your life until it is fixed. It is not an obvious defect but it basically destroys your life until it is fixed.

The Transgender crowd wants everyone to believe this is a gender issue when being born transsexual is a sex identity issue. Few dare to push back because if you do you are called transphobic and called bigoted because the men running the Transgender Agenda have learned well from the GLB community and have somehow blinded everyone to the simple fact that sexual orientation is a hell of a lot different than either a sex identity issue or even a gender issue.

If you ask any of them if they have had SRS they will respond angrily that it is none of your business, probably correct sometimes based on context, and that whether they have or have not is not relevant because they are women, they are completely wrong there. They do not fight for women's issues, they fight for "trans" issues and in most cases those "trans" issues are aimed taking something away from women and giving it to the "transgender" individual who in reality is mostly a man in a dress. They are mostly "new" rights for men but they conveniently ignore that.

I never wanted to be transsexual so why the heck would I want to be called "trans" the rest of my life. I am not a victim, I am a survivor and that gave me the option of living a full life as a woman and I have. The regrets I have in my life relate to what I was denied such as pregnancy, even menstruation, and all the silly little and sometimes troublesome problems girls and women lived with. I wanted it all including being my daddy's little girl and he died before that was possible. When you want something as badly as we do you take the good with the bad without even a question or regret. This is something unknown to the majority of the Transgender crowd.

I wonder how often MR gives one of MR's speeches where MR mentions the fact MR has a functioning penis and enjoys using it? I bet most think MR is really transsexual and post-op rather than a she-male or gay man in a dress. I bet that would be a big surprise to all in attendance. Yes I know MR those men enjoy your 7 inch neoclit, as you have reminded us all many times, but just a tiny little clue again MR. They are gay and so are you and there is absolutely not one thing wrong with that except you seem to believe you have something relevant to say to those born transsexual and sadly you do not but that has never bothered people like you.





Friday, July 26, 2013

Transgender Activists and Stealth.

Monica Roberts (MR) is at it again with another rancid post about those who choose to just live their lives rather than be public, also know as stealth, which is a new pejorative to limp-dicked assholes like Monica Roberts and her "straight men", sure they are, that like her 7 inch neoclit also known as her dick which must still function well.

http://transgriot.blogspot.com/2013/07/stealth-doesnt-help-trans-community.html


Cristan Williams also had a post about stealth and it can be read here.

http://www.transadvocate.com/a-rant-about-mtf-stealth.htm


They make the assumption that those who have been born transsexual and had their SRS are still trans. That is incorrect because based on medical terms once our sex is aligned with our mind we are in essence cured. There is nothing we can "cross" over to because we have already made the crossing when we had SRS. The only other cross possible is back and that does not happen with those born transsexual.

The irony and villainy of their claims that we are always "trans" is lost on almost everyone and that includes many born transsexual and it is pathetic and sad. The position they are taking is identical to the position certain radical feminists and other people claiming we cannot change our sex have been pushing for years. They are enforcing the idea and the concept that we will "always" be male so we are and will "always" be "trans" so we should just get over it and identify ourselves as something less than female and a woman. Monica Roberts will always be male because Monica has a "dick" and she uses it as she has said many times on her blog.

They are giving ammunition to those that want us categorized and labeled as something we do not want to be, which is less than a female or a woman. They want us to be "less" so they can be more since a large percentage of them still pack a penis and the rest probably wish they still had theirs because actually having to live as a woman in a man's world without a crutch, like being "trans", is not something that fits in their view of themselves as a victim. Activists in the "trans" community need to remain victims otherwise they have no relevance. What relevance would they have if a law was passed that simply stated after SRS the individual is now legally the other sex and has all the rights of that sex in society?

In the Cristan Williams  (CW) post CW goes into the definition of what it means to live that way and since she has not a single clue, she never has, she makes many assumptions that easily make an ass out of her but thankfully not me. People like CW and MR honestly believe they have the right to tell other people how to live their lives because they of course know what is right and nobody else could possibly have a clue. This has nothing to do with the rule of law of access to women's spaces but simple living one's life.

The following paragraph is from the CW post.
Stealth people say things like “I just want to get on with my life as the woman I am” – a sentiment that sounds rational enough on the surface. The problem with that sentiment is that it’s also a delusion. Stealth people rationalize their lies by believing that being trans was only a medical problem that was fixed – kind of like a cleft palate; purposefully pretending that there wasn’t a social transition that entailed violating numerous cultural norms. Stealth is purposefully taking away the choice of letting the people you claim to love the most decide if they are willing to take on the potential social costs (as unfair and stupid as those social costs might be) of breaking those backwards cultural norms by being with you. If you believe that it is only a medical condition, remember that I said that you’re delusional when your best friend, your husband or wife, your boyfriend or girlfriend, your adopted child, etc finds out that you lied about your social and medical history. Yes, it is a medical condition that should be treated medically, but to pretend that this medical condition is exactly like having laser eye surgery is nothing more than living in denial. Living an authentic life means having the courage to stand firmly on the ground on truth regardless of what stupid, moronic and asinine stereotypes and/or fears others may choose to cling to.
CW is deliberately mixing certain concepts here but one can read this and realize CW does not believe this is a medical condition but a social condition complicated by a self perceived medical condition. CW attempts to cover her tracks later in the paragraph but you do not put "that" out there alone knowing how those born transsexual feel about it unless CW is dumber than a fence post which might actually be possible.

Ignore the word stealth and read that paragraph. Getting on with your life as the woman you are is not a delusion because CW seems to have forgotten that everyone transitions, breaks those cultural norms, faces their best friends and family, if married the wife and children if applicable. Some of us lived "out" in the open until we had SRS because we could not hide our obvious differences from other boys. I am sure CW never had to worry about that. CW also misses the simple point that universally, except for a rare few, we always tell the man we will marry and also misses the valuable point that we are not lying to our friends and others about our social and medical history because it never comes up because unlike you we fit into society as women, which is something neither CW or MR will ever do. I am sure in your world people ask about your "social" and "medical" history but in the real world that is not something anyone talks about. Living is more important. They talk about your social and medical history because it is quite obvious you are or once were male. It is a sad fact that you perpetrate on yourself by screaming at everyone that you are trans.

The pathetic analogy that SRS is like a cleft palate or laser eye surgery is quite telling about CW. Anyone that has gone through SRS would never and I mean NEVER be that flip about it because it is incredibly painful and the recovery time is extensive. I doubt CW has had SRS but I could be wrong.

Living an authentic life does not mean what CW claims it does. If in your heart and soul you are female then you are being true to yourself by living as the person you believe you should have been. It is your life to live and you deserve to live it as you see fit as long as you are not hurting others and these fallacious claims by clowns like NR and CW that somehow your life hurts the "trans" world makes the basic assumption that we are required to believe in the trans agenda and it assumes we accept the premise you represent us. You do not represent us and we do not buy the man in a dress is a woman because he says he is.

Those of us that survived simply melted into the real world, as was our right, and our wish. We all just needed to be girls so why would we want to be less and call ourselves trans when we have nothing left to cross? We crossed our bridge both medically and mentally but you MR never has and never will because MR is half and half while CW has certainly never crossed the mental hurdle and accepted herself as a female and a woman although I have doubts about SRS. The best MR can be considered is a she-male or a transvestite living full-time.  I have a different assessment about what MR actually is later.The choice is yours.

You would love every stealth person to out themselves because then you can claim they are girls like you. MR is not a girl like Janet Mock because MNR is neither a woman nor post operative. You are a another transgender fool trying to ride the coattails of those born transsexual that corrected their birth defect and lived a life. Janet Mock has the right to out herself since she is obviously comfortable being a transwoman and thus less than a full woman although I will never view her as such since I feel it demeans her. She will always be a woman in my mind.

Luckily when I was kind of "out" I was able to realize the errors of my way and just vanish into the real world. That is something MR, CW, and their ilk will never know a thing about because they revel in being "different" which is odd because I thought the obvious idea was trying to become female or a woman.  I guess you men get to change the rules so a woman can have a penis and balls. It must be another teaching moment.

My question to MR is how could any of us have been a role model to the transgendered since 95% of you want to keep your dick and balls? Were you hoping for fashion tips? God knows you could use a few. Were you looking for tips with men? Not sure how that works but my vagina is distinctly different that your dick from the view of all the straight men I have dated unlike the "straight men" you have entertained. Your ass does not qualify as a vagina!!

What I love about "trans" like MR is how you want to bring your misery to everyone's lives. You actually believe you are a role model which is beyond ridiculous. You are a professional transgender nitwit that honestly believes your views have validity with those born transsexual but nothing could be farther from the truth. You are simply another man in a dress pretending to be a woman while keeping their male parts because after all they give you pleasure. No female or woman alive would EVER think or feel that way. You are just another gay man in a dress trying to deny the truth so guess what? You are the one in the closet. That is from my friend Oscar who is about as gay as it comes and people in the gay community look at fools like you MR and just shake their head.  Is their something wrong with admitting you are gay?

Personally I do not have any need nor do I wish to promote the agenda of men in dresses and any laws or effect you fools have helped pass were done with lies and misinformation because few of the idiots that helped realized they were dealing with transvestites although a Democratic organization in North Carolina actually did and told the individual to join the men's organization and I believe it was because he has a penis and does not intend to remove it and they found out and were shocked. Reality bites sometimes.

What is pathetically sad here is that none of you have a clue about what it was like back in the 60's. Suzan Cooke does but she has gone over to the dark side and now considers herself a "transwoman" which is odd since she was a female and a woman for a long time. I guess this is just another way to denigrate herself but despite our differences she is a woman whether she likes it or not and I will always consider her a female and a woman.

In many ways it was more dangerous but also simpler and better times in the 60's and early 70's.  The gay men, the lesbians, the drag queens, and we transsexuals all got along extremely well and we supported each other. It was illegal to cross-dress in NYC and although many cops looked the other way, many did not. The clubs opened at 10 PM so you went home and took a nap and went out and partied until 4 PM. I learned to avoid the tranny clubs because they were dangerous and when I went out it was to the clubs where the crowd was a mixture of straight, celebrity, gay, drag, tranny, and lesbian. We all got along and our friendships crossed boundaries. I helped bail out more than a few that were arrested because they were friends.

Back then the goal of everyone born transsexual was to blend into society and live as a girl and a woman. If that is not the logical conclusion for the nightmarish ride those of us born transsexual have survived then why were we doing it? We lived this nightmare so we could reach our dream and then walk into the nightmare of having everyone know of our past so we can "support" a group of men in dresses and their "social" need to cross-dress? I and others were supposed to travel that road again because some dipshit activist can tell the world "they are the same as I am" when there is nothing that can or could be farther from the truth. Our only common thread is we belong to the same species although sometimes I wonder.

I have lived and worked as a woman for basically all of my adult life and my friends have done the same. We owe the "trans" community not a damn thing although we do owe kids like us and we have repaid that debt many times over. I have had no need to set precedents for other transsexuals because we all recognized that after our SRS we were fledgling girls and anything we went through after that was worth it a million times over. Your problem, both of you, is that under no circumstances can you or are you capable of standing on your own as a girl or a woman because you have no clue what it means to truly live as a woman. You live with the crutch of being "trans" because it makes things easier and that is the truth whether you can or will ever admit it to yourself.

Assimilation into the world of women is not a given it is something you learn and earn over time and neither of you have the capacity or willingness to do that. I have never not been hired because I was once transsexual but I have not been hired because I was a woman. I have never been discriminated against because I was once transsexual but I have been discriminated against because I was a woman. I have never been denied a promotion because I was once transsexual but I have because I was a woman.

I am Welsh so I don't get too mad I just get even. The Company that reused to hire me I put out of business working for a rival. I beat the place that discriminated against me and beat them badly. I quit the Company that denied me a promotion because John had a family and need the position by resigning and since I was the only one that understood the overall design and complexity of a product they had to come to me for help. I gave them no notice and left immediately so they had no chance to drain my brain on the subject. I fought my battles as a woman and I won some and I lost a lot but I fought them as a woman and am proud of that. CW and MR fight battles for men's rights to pretend they are women and infringe on the few privileges we have. How very male of you!

I can honestly say I rarely ever thought of the past because it was over and I was free. Even when helping the young transsexuals we focused on their future. I know about my past and I recognize its difficulties and the trauma it caused me and I caused my family but why would I dwell on it? Living in the past is not productive to a well lived life because regret is a big part of the past for everyone. I deal with the past if it comes up but I live for the now. I write this blog because I have opinions and I intend to put them out there.

If you want to be "out" it is your right but it is also my right to live a quiet and peaceful life. When you read MR and CW talk about stealth it reeks of  sour grapes because it was never something they could pull off because it requires one to actually "be" a female and a woman rather than "pretend" to be a female and a woman. They are lying to themselves and to everyone in their so-called "trans" world when denouncing those of us that are not "out and proud" because I certainly never found anything prideful or enjoyable about being born transsexual. I found it painful, nightmarish, and conceptually I never understood why I was just not born a girl. I shed a lot of tears like my friends did and I hurt beyond hurt watching girls do what I wanted so badly. Why would I give that up?

The best day of my life was in that hospital room when I woke up and Dr. Benjamin was there and simply said, "it is over" and I had a good cry for the joy of the moment. It was over because I was finally me and now I read some dipshits telling me that somehow I am less because I MUST identify as "trans". There are few things more FUBAR than that stupid and idiotic belief.

The following passage from CW says it all.

Being a transwoman and being a ciswoman are just two somewhat different ways of arriving at being a woman; living stealth supports the bogus idea that you’re not really a woman and you must therefore hide the truth from discovery. 
Actually CW you have it reversed but then you know that. Living as a transwoman is not akin to being a woman and although we born transsexual follow a more difficult path to be women the aim is to be accepted as a ciswoman. calling yourself a "transwoman" implies you are different than a woman and emphasizes there is a difference. I am a woman and there is nothing trans about any part of my life. This is just another attempt by men to force their maleness on women as equivalency. A vagina is not a penis regardless of how it is constructed.

You do not have to be beautiful to be a woman. You do not have to pass particularly well to be a woman. What you have to do is accept yourself as a female, a woman and accept what life brings you as a woman. That is not easy for men since they control most of the world both politically and business wise.  Being "out and proud" allows them to control their worlds and being "transwomen" allows them to control the narrative and scream transphobia if someone so much as farts in their direction. They keep the jobs they had as men. They want to keep the wife because after all she is a possession and are upset if it fails and of course blame the wife for not "understanding" that even if they are 55 they have "no choice" because they were born this way. Not true but then they rarely deal with the truth head on.

The true delusion is the belief people like MR and CW actually have a clue about being women. It goes right along with the maleness of believing that if they wear a dress and decent wig they are woman. Only a man could promote that delusion. Only a man could promote the delusion that it is just as good to be a "transwoman" as a woman because they are promoting the idea and belief that a man in a dress with his penis is just as much of a woman as any woman which is complete and utter bullshit and in this case the "bull" part of "bullshit" fits appropriately.


Friday, July 19, 2013

Never Let The Facts Get in the Way of the Truth

The simple fact of the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case is the simple truth that it was not white on black anything. It was Hispanic on Black because if one attempts to define Martin as white the Obama is white because of his mother and Martin is white because of his father. It is a matter of convenience for the race baiters of the world to claim Martin is white because on does need to perpetuate the image of white racism against American blacks.

I would never claim that there are not racists because it is impossible to legislate against stupidity but the claims of Al Shaprton and others that "whites are hunting our black children" is complete and total bullshit but then again one does need a reason to exist when your life is built on perpetuating the white/black divide.

The next piece of bullshit is the claims that "stand your ground" is harmful to blacks and makes blacks susceptible to murder by whites. The Tampa Bay Times has kept records of reported Stand Your Ground cases in Florida and they do tell a different story. The Trayvon Martin case is listed under the Hispanic/Black category because that is where it belongs. The statistics are interesting. Based on the percentage of blacks in Florida's population matrix blacks have a statistically better change of  being involved in the use of the law by the Black Foridian. Florida is 15.8% black and 63% white.

Based on these statistics the following is true. Using all cases where blacks were the ones using the law there were 8 convictions, 21 justified, and 8 still pending in court. In cases where blacks were the victims it was 7 convictions, 23 justified, 6 still pending.

With whites as the aggressor it is 1 conviction, 6 justified, and 4 pending verses black Floridians.

With blacks as the aggressor it is 2 convictions, 4 justified and 4 pending with whites as the victims. Statistically that is not much different but it certainly shows that only 11 times has a white Floridian used Stand Your Ground or even been considered by some as a Stand Your Ground case.

Overall when a black is using Stand Your Ground they were convicted 8 times, justified 21 times, with 8 cases pending.

Overall when a White claims Stand Your Ground they were convicted 27 times, justified 42 times, with 9 cases pending.

The following lists the Accuser then victim with convictions, justified and pending in order.

white-white 25-32-4
white/Hispanic 1-4-1
white/black 1-6-4
black/white 2-4-4
black/Hispanic 0-1-0
black/black 6-16-4
Hispanic/White 2-2-1
Hispanic/Black 0-3-0 includes Trayvon Martin case
Hispanic/Hispanic 0-2-0

Therefore the assumptions made by certain black leaders are spurious and disingenuous because they know Martin is Hispanic and the fact his father was white does not make him white. If this was true those listed as minorities would be lost and we would have elected "white" Obama as President and not have set a precedent for the world that we can see past color, well the massive majority of America can despite what is being said. Zimmerman by all standards used in the United States is Hispanic and not white.

Where is the claim Hispanics are targeting black youth? One cannot do that because Hispanics are part of the democratic base so conveniently calling Zimmerman "white" works for them. The FBI interviewed 36 people and stated in writing it was not a racist crime but that is not good enough despite how politicized both the FBI and the Justice Department have been under Holder.

Like most Americans I feel horrible for the Martin family but maybe they can find some  in civil court like the OJ verdict brought about. If the Justice department brings a civil rights case against Martin will he be listed as Hispanic? We all know the answer to that question and it is actually really an inconvenient truth. Yes!

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Notes and Thoughts

Watched a show I enjoy this evening called "Major Crimes" on TNT and it was about a 13 year old transsexual that had transitioned and was presenting and living as a girl. She is terrorized by a nasty bully and is murdered by someone. I will not give away the plot but the show was well done and quite provocative.

The empathy displayed by Lt. Provenza is done well and the manner in which they handle the dichotomy of views and opinions of children like this is provoking and well done. For those interested it will be repeated for sure next Monday at 8 PM EST but is available at other times and is repeated often enough on TNT.


Finally got a chance to watch the movie "42" this evening late and it lived up to its reviews and then some. For those not in the know it is about Jackie Robinson the first black player in Major League Baseball and his importance to both integrating baseball and beginning the process of ending the stupidity of segregation cannot possibly be understood by those of us that are white.

I remember my Grandfather, a civil rights advocate very early on, saying Jackie Robinson was one of the bravest men that ever put on a uniform in any sport. The movie has baseball in it but is as much a study of this amazing man and Branch Rickey the Dodgers owner and the incredible struggle and horrendous and vitriolic treatment Robinson withstood with more grace and integrity than is describable. An absolute must see movie.


I don't like getting involved in public cases but I must comment on the Trayvon Martin case and it is only my opinion. I followed it on television since I am retired and I do not understand the need for guns in the hands of people that have no clue. The evidence was so poorly presented that the jury had little choice but to acquit. It was a stupid case of He said and he said only the young black kid, Trayvon, was not there to give his side.

The portrayal of Zimmerman as white was sill and used to race bait by certain people, Sharpton is one, whose only reason for existence is exploitation of racism. The FBI investigated and after 36 witnesses said they could see no racism involved. The only person who truly knows is Zimmerman and he is not going to talk.

Zimmerman should never have gotten out of his car which is what started the chain of events that led to the death of a 17 year old young black male. It is beyond tragic in my humble opinion because if Zimmerman had not exited his car like the 911 operator told him not to do none of this would have happened. The state over-charged Zimmerman and basically had no case for 2nd degree murder or even manslaughter because it came down to a self defense case which is odd because this was a fistfight that ended up with a gun and somehow that is one-sided in my opinion.

If they had included involuntary manslaughter I firmly believe they would have convicted him of that although the incompetence of the prosecution was beyond bad. When your witnesses turn out better for the defense then you have a problem because the jury must find one guilty "beyond a reasonable doubt" which the prosecution did not prove.

It gives one an empty feeling because Zimmerman created the confrontation and there were no consequences for shooting a 17 year old. Somehow it seems unfair and I do not buy the premise his life was in danger because it makes the assumption that Trayvon would have beaten him to death with his fists. Getting your ass kicked because you started something doesn't mean you shoot them.

Maybe the family will get some solace in civil court where Zimmerman has to testify but none of it will bring Trayvon Martin back.


There have been demonstrations after the Zimmerman acquittal and I understand the frustration but I would like to ask Al Sharpton and his ilk something. Why aren't you demonstrating in Chicago where 50 black people were murdered over the July 4th weekend? Those are casualties one would expect in the Afghan war several years ago. These were gang related and black on black murders  or possibly Hispanic-black gang related.

Why is this carnage acceptable in Chicago. Is it because the democratic party does not want to harm its base? It is worse in Chicago today than it was back in the time of Capone and Prohibition which should terrify someone but it seems to be sloughed off as business as usual and if questioned the masterful Chicago politicians will blame it on gun rights, guns, Republicans or anybody as long as it is not them.

Where is the outrage over this senseless loss of life. The Police seem to have the attitude it is 50 less gang bangers ans so do the pols. It really does make me wonder if the Democrats really give a carp about blacks other than keeping them poor and afraid so they will vote for the supposed friend in the Democratic party.

Does anyone actually care about these people in the inner city? Sometimes I think the Democrats want them the way they are and the Republicans are too afraid to propose a solution that might upset the relative few truly right wing loons that actually exist.


Saturday, July 6, 2013

Am I a Separatist?

I have read some interesting stuff while on my extended vacation traveling around the United States.  It was time to visit family in New England, Montana, and Texas so I do apologize if I have been lax in approving comments. Of course old age caught up and I drove the wrong car North to New England and after that visit actually returned to North Carolina to get a more suitable ride and a much faster ride and to be blunt a much more comfortable seat and ride. It really does suck getting old.

Now to the topic for this post.

Separatist is defined in the following way.

The Free Dictionary:

1. One who secedes or advocates separation, especially from an established church; a sectarian or separationist.
2. One who advocates disjunction of a group from a larger group or political unit: Basque separatists.
3. One who advocates cultural, ethnic, or racial separation.


I could go on and add multiple links to other definitions but they are all rather similar. So the question at hand is am I a separatist? The answer in simple terms is NO and the answer even in a complex argument is NO because having been born transsexual a long time ago I and many of my sisters and brothers were around a long time before that fruitcake Virginia prince coined the term transgender and long before these late transitioning men decided they needed to force transsexuals under their transgender banner to benefit their "trans" group.

Long before some of these self described activists decided to be "transgender" they were running around as the "Transsexual Menace" and groups of that ilk that were in your face and aggressively pushing their myopic view of what it meant to be born transsexual. Even then many of these people could not get past the fact they were born this way but were no longer this way after SRS except for the simple fact many of them made a mistake having SRS. Some used their positions to actually push  the views of those attempting to marginalize us and that is exactly what is happening today with those pushing the transgender mantra.

I was never transgender because for a short time I was transsexual because I was born that way but gave up that crutch a very long time ago. One can only be a separatist if one actually ever "belonged to" and "accepted" the group as the controlling party for group communication. Maybe it is more of an old-timer thing but I certainly do not remember being "asked" if I wanted to join the transgender movement.

Forcing a group such as those born transsexual under the banner of transgender only benefits those who are transgender. This is a common tactic of those on the left to bring about a collective thought process that supposedly represents the group but almost always represents the views of the leaders and drowns out the voices of those forced to conform. This is what I see with the transgender crowd. If you disagree with their mantra you are transphobic.

It is symptomatic of the political climate in this country today. If you are not with me you are my enemy and this goes for both principle parties. It holds true for almost everything in life today. I am opposed to abortion but do not believe I have the right to tell another woman what she can do unless she has passed the no go zone and has entered the period of late abortion. That makes me kind of an enigma to many of my friends who are either vehemently pro-life or vehemently pro-choice.

I look at myself as being rather consistent in my views. I am opposed to Capital Punishment and abortion but abide by the laws currently in place but I consider my opinion consistent. Those that are pro-life and for Capital Punishment or pro-choice and against Capital Punishment have an inconsistent position. The pro life people are very inconsistent when one considers they fight against access for birth control and the day after pill.

The position that we are trans forever is also inconsistent and inappropriate for those born transsexual. It fits the transvestites and those that never want SRS but it certainly does not fit those of us that simply fixed our perceived birth defect and got on with our lives. It does not mean I have forgotten what I went through and how I made my life worthwhile because it will always be part of my past as is every human's childhood. Mine just had a few more nightmarish situations, some of which i fumbled horribly, that can either break you or move you forward. I was lucky there because I had a mom and two brothers that cared and then a boy but we all have those people in our lives at one time or another.

I completely agree that Autumn Sandeen will be "trans" forever and that is Autumn's right as it is my right to deny my inclusion under an umbrella term that is primarily aimed at supporting the rights of men, including their penis, to claim they are women just because they say they are and thus should have access to all women's spaces because they are self-defined as women. If you have a penis and are on your way to SRS then I welcome you into the world of girls and hope you learn to be a woman. If you want to keep your penis or have kept your penis and have no intention of offing it then you can call yourself whatever the heck you want but at best you are a "trans" woman or even a she-male or even a transvestite but you are not a girl nor are you a woman.

Sex is binary in 99+ percent of existence and those that are not are a combination of the two and those born intersex hopefully get to be the sex they want. Gender is illusory because one can change one's appearance on a daily basis and be whatever one wants and I actually support that within reason. Gender has always been fluid because it is a social construct but there has long been a movement to equate sex and gender and to blur the lines and they have been effective unfortunately. Sex and gender may be equivalent but they also may not unless of course you are transgender and Mark is playing Mary for the evening. Then of course we are all required to call Mark Mary and use female pronouns because he chooses to be female for the evening. Actually he chooses to be Mark in a dress with his alter ego name Mary and gender wise he may appear female but he is far from female. and is factually a man in a dress.

The transgender crowd have basically colonized us and forced us, or tried to, under their banner much like we did to the American Indian and has been done to other indigenous groups by "other" who claim they know better and for the betterment of the assimilated group. This of course was never what the assimilated group wanted. They wanted their independence and freedom because they did not and do not fit under the collective group. Those of us born transsexual were assimilated under the transgender umbrella against our will and of course the collective brands anyone that deviates from the collective mind a traitor or in our case a separatist. They conveniently forget we were never voluntarily part of their perverse little collective.

If anyone points out the inconsistencies or the blatant stupidity of some transgender concepts one is transphobic. Deny access to a man in a dress to women's spaces and you are transphobic. It is of course a teaching moment when we can teach our young that a man in a dress claiming to be female has both his rights as a man and your rights as a woman just because he says so. They protect their positions earned as men in Corporate America yet in their lives they walked over women and gained power denied women but now they demand to be accepted as women. I wonder how many of these "so-called" women would do it if they had to start over and could not keep their position gained as men? Ever notice how many suddenly are "women" after they retire? Loss of testosterone and the allure of the dress are the bane of many a transvestite.

These are a few of the people that push the transgender agenda and it is for selfish reasons. It lets them live their fantasy at the expense of others. I read a lot and some of what I read is just so funny it would make a great tv show but it is also so sad. I find it so humorous when the 6'-3" 230 pound man rents a hotel room so he can go out en femme and then turns around and writes how wonderful everyone was on his night out with his fellow "girls". They of course are wearing the age appropriate mini skirt with the massive boobs and that girlish figure and do not realize that 99.99% of mankind is not fucking with some 6'-3" 230 pound man regardless of how he is dressed.  None of them care they are hurting their families and taking money away from their children's and their family future because they need to dress because it is the cloths that matter most. To a transsexual it is being the wrong sex that matters the most, case closed.

The transgender are looking for acceptance and they use the transsexuals under their umbrella to gain it. Does anyone honestly believe any transgender laws or ordinances would pass if you replaced transgender with its true meaning of transvestite? None is the right answer. That is why they needed to colonize those born transsexual and the worst part is they have co-opted most of those in the medical community serving those children born transsexual from Boston Children's to Los Angeles Children's by labeling them transgender when they know they are transsexual.

I do realize some transsexuals have fallen under the delusion they are transgender and do hope after SRS or even if they have had SRS they will realize the errors of their ways but it is their right as it is my right to be a contrarian because I am not a separatist because that would imply I ever allowed myself to be colonized. I did not.