Cotton Ceiling, Lesbians, Transbians, Pretendbians, and Men

I would like to thank a friend for bringing this farce to my attention. Thanks to a friend because if anyone but our mutual friend had told me about this I would have laughed my ass off at its utter stupidity because I have had a hard enough time getting my mind around the simple fact that men in dresses think they have the right to be considered women and the right to enter women's spaces. My issue actually seems to pale a little after thinking about the issue I am about to take on. I copied the following from article.

The term cotton ceiling is a reference to the “glass ceiling” that second wave feminist identified in the workforce, wherein women could only advance so high in the workforce but could not break through into positions of power and authority. The cotton represents underwear, signifying sex.

First just so people will not think I am nuts, they will anyways I bet, here is the link that has a good discussion about the above including a lengthy debate about it. Here is the Link.

The basic gist of the problem is a "transwoman" or as we all know them a "transvestite" is claiming that he is a transbian or a lesbian with a trans history but with a big gotcha for any lesbian. They are still packing a penis. One of the arguers is lesbian and the other is a transwoman that has a penis or certainly supports lesbians with a penis.

If you follow the entire post it is to say the least both bizarre and enlightening and follows the same bullshit mantra that the transgender penis packers scream about only they have taken it a lot farther here. The claim is that a female bodied woman may have a penis so they are redefining what the female sex characteristics are and have taken that step I knew they were headed for. They want to redefine female so men can fit in when they want to. How convenient for the men.

The argument is that the transwoman gets to define whether she is female bodied and it is her decision and it is both transphobic and trans-misogynistic to claim they are not women.

Thanks. So, just to make sure I understand this, a trans woman with a penis, and who has no desire to have a sex change, is not male bodied – correct? 

Response 

There is nothing inherently male about a woman’s body, unless she identified things about it as male herself. So, no, I do not consider trans women with penises to be male-bodied, unless that is how they identify.

This is the most patently absurd thing I have ever read in my life. The dear man gets it any way he wants. It is his choice while the poor little woman must accept it. Kind of reminds me of how they think concerning women's spaces.

I am a heterosexual woman with a history. I like men because it is how heterosexual women think. I have many lesbian friends and they do not want men as a sex partner.  What is the key component of a man's sex characteristics? His fucking penis of course.

What is being said here is that a lesbian woman that would not even consider a penis packing trans woman as a sex partner is transphobic or trans-misogynistic which I find a weird word. These fucking pathetic wankers in dresses are now demanding lesbian women accept them as lesbian partners and willingly accept being fucked with the one thing about men lesbians basically hate which is a penis. I bet this gets these transvestites titillated. They want to play girl and have their normal heterosexual sex they had with the wife with some poor lesbian and demand the woman accepts her as a lesbian, possibly feminist, without that horrible complication of actually physically becoming a woman.

Do you notice what the trend is here. It is natal women and women with a history that must accept this situation as it is put forth by these men without the right of protest or we are haters and transphobic. Personally if I was a lesbian I would eagerly plan for sex with one of the transbians with a penis and freak out and cut the fucking penis right off and deball the bastard as a second present. I would then call Kevin Reddington out of Brockton, Massachusetts, the real F. Lee Bailey of Attorneys and take my shot in court. I am appalled at violence but this is justifiable mutilation in my humble opinion.

How insulting is this to any lesbian? They are now supposed to have sex with another "woman" and will need protection so they will not get pregnant or some sexually transmitted disease from this pervert. This is another classic case of men attempting to impose their will and their perverted fantasies onto women. There are few cases of women sadistically raping, torturing, and killing men but the opposite is all to common. These are cases where men need to exert power over women this lesbian sex issue it is a classic example of it. Lesbians call them pretendbians as in pretend lesbians.

These transbian men with a penis want the privilege of being considered female and the privilege of having female sexual partners as woman on woman while using a prick. Somehow that sounds like some form of male pornographic fantasy.  I bet if you searched Amazon for transvestite books like this it would list a bunch.

Now for the key point here. The trend is obvious.  Men forcing women to submit to their fantasy and calling it transphobic if we do not. My question is simple. Why aren't they demanding the same of their fellow men?

If what they say here is not a man that refuses to have anal sex with a man in a dress and refuses to accept the transwoman as a woman really transphobic. Where is the outrage over this injustice? There is none.  Why? Because they know their fellow men would beat the living shit out of them if they pulled that kind of crap. Why are they not demanding men accept them as women into the men's room so they can pee standing up which they prefer anyway? They would get the shit kicked out them again.  Do you get the drift here?

Women are weaker than men and we are not usually in positions of power like men so these men are accustomed to pushing women around and making us do what they want. It is nothing more than another form of abuse men commit on women.  In this case we are demeaned and forced to accept men as female and thus lose our singular advantage which is our sex characteristics because we all know straight men are obsessed with breasts and the female vagina

To those of us truly born transsexual a vagina is very important and anyone that says otherwise is delusional. If these sissy boys when in dresses gave up their penis and actually had a functioning vagina they would be the object of their scorn, which is a woman. Their fucking penis has always been their male pleasure point and as men they see no reason they should have to give that up in order to be female so they will redefine female. It quite simply, in the only words I can think of, is another way to put women in their place which is beneath men.

It has finally come full circle and men want female redefined as someone who "feels" they are female bodied and even with a penis they are as female as we are. So we have reached the state where men believe they have the right to be pretend females and pretend lesbians and if anyone questions them they are transphobic.

The absurdity of demanding that a lesbian accept sex with a man in a dress pretending to be a woman is beneath contempt. It is the same for women's spaces. Expect to see responses where these men will claim  surgery is too dangerous, a vagina does not define you as female, and sundry other excuses. Have at it boys and no complaints if some lesbian performs a Lorena Bobbit for you because in my opinion you deserve it.