Saturday, March 2, 2013

Thoughts, Zoe Brainless, Kids, and Fools

Just when I thought I was out they pulled me back in! Not really, but I sure did enjoy the vacation with friends, my step-daughter, and older brother and his family in Daytona Beach  Florida although ducking car parts in the stands was a little more then we bargained for. Great weather and a lot of fun.

Over the time I have blogged I have made several comments about Zoe Brain whose name I officially would petition should be changed to Brainless. For those not in the know Zoe is the one that claimed she had spontaneous feminization and turned into a girl and that her male parts magically went away or atrophied up into her body and is now biologically female. Zoe is quite famous for commenting on everything transgender and along with her spontaneous feminization claims she is also intersex none of which is true unless being born transsexual is intersex.

Zoe claimed to be a rocket scientist although I believe she may have taken that down. Just to be accurate she was never a rocket scientist. Zoe is not nor has she ever been intersex. I actually know the person who suggested that she may be one evening in a chat.  The very next day Zoe was intersex on her blog and sorry there are no instant intersex tests. Zoe has managed to weasel her way onto several television shows in Australia, they seem to have lower standards than the US even, that talked about intersex and the true difficulties those that are born that way deal with. It was enough to make one puke if you know the truth.

Zoe is a father so Zoe is not nor has Zoe ever been biologically female and Zoe had SRS in Thailand although she claimed she did not. It is kind of difficult to keep up with the evolving story line. My beef with Zoe is the simple truth she did not "spontaneously" feminize and if you do not believe me find some pictures of Zoe. My other beef is of course with her claims of being intersex which she is not.

Well I received a comment from Zoe Brainless on a very old post early this morning and it was to this post about lateral hostility and the transgender woman.

Well I was never transgender nor am I a transgender woman.  I am simply a woman albeit one approaching 70 faster than she likes. I have no idea whether Zoe was born transsexual but in my view since she actually did have SRS in Thailand she is a woman. Zoe's problem is being a woman seems to not be good enough and like most in the transgender mafia anyone that questions her is transphobic and thus this lateral hostility bullshit.

Do I have some hostility towards some in the transgender community? You are darn right I do! Being told that those of us born transsexual are the same as some cross dressing bald 62 year old dipshit from buttfuck Ohio is bad enough, but watching these men in dresses systematically attempt to demolish the concept of someone being born transsexual by equating it with some weekend crossdresser is kind of infuriating.

I was very lucky in many ways but the luckiest thing was I started estrogen just before I was 14 so I was never a "man" like Zoe was. I never fathered a child like Zoe did. Unless one was told I was always perceived as a girl which in my life in those days was at times a blessing and at times extremely dangerous.


That brings me to another point and that is transsexual children. One of the two children we are currently helping lost her therapist for a while when the therapist became very ill. Being a child transsexual when everyone knows what you are is psychologically demanding to say the least. We told her to find another therapist and we talked with her parents and told them not to worry about the cost since we cover it or in this case my close friend covers it. Just find her an understanding therapist who is close to the previous one.

My friend and I are old school and these children all of your see on television are transsexual and yes they are under the transgender umbrella but they are truly psychosexual inverted transsexuals with incredibly intense sex identification issues. They follow natal females exactly when it comes to percentages that are straight or lesbian because they are female and they are willing to fight the world to prove it.

Well our just turned 16 year old found a new therapist and the child had two immediate problems with him. The first was he adamantly refused to use the word transsexual because it was insulting to others under the transgender banner and he was appalled that the child had been on hormones and blockers for 2 years. We dropped that therapist like a bad habit because if there is one thing these kids need it is approval. Her original therapist has recovered enough from her illness to resume helping this beautiful 16 year old old young lady but it suddenly dawned on me that maybe the therapists are the issue in the transgender verses transsexual dispute.

Everyone seems to use transgender because it is politically correct because lord knows offending those men in dresses is such a bad thing to do. I am wondering if anyone that is currently in therapy has found this an issue elsewhere.  By this I mean has anyone had a therapist insist that even though you identify as transsexual insist on calling you transgender?



CNN had a show on the child Coy that is 6 ears old and was refused access to the girls room after having access for most of her first year. Very few of you out there have even the slightest clue the amount of courage, determination, and fortitude it takes for a young transsexual to demand acceptance for who he or she is by actually transitioning or pushing appearance boundaries that cause problems.

One of the problems with associating child transsexuals with the term transgender is the inherent danger that society will assume the attitude the child is still a boy. personally I can assure you we were not and are not but when you are associated with transvestites, cross-dressers, and the transgender umbrella people have started to wake up to what it really means which is a good old boy group trying to push their male fantasies on others.

Even when I was 5 I knew girls did not have what I had but I did not know what the difference was but I hated that thing and it continued until I had SRS. Media Matters has a video from a CNN show where this Pediatrician Dr. James Sear co-host of the CBS show "The Doctors" claims this 6 year old MTF transsexual child would walk around the girls room with his penis showing because all little boys do that. It has to be watched to be believed.

The child already wants to know when she can be fixed because a penis is disgusting and was disgusting to us as children. The simple truth is the earlier a child can socialize in their correct sex the better off they will be as adults because they will fit into their correct sex seamlessly. Sometimes doctors are the worst enemies of child transsexuals.



Massachusetts Public schools have a new transgender policy and in general after reading it completely I agree with a lot of it and its intention is noble. The thought that a child could discuss being transgender with an adult at school, a counselor, and not with their parents is naive but any help that a trans child, I mean ANY trans child regardless, gets is worth the effort because children should not have to suffer with this crap but not informing parents is a slippery slope in my humble opinion.

The other slippery slope is the mandate that the child be allowed to play sports as the gender they identify as. I doubt this will ever be an issue because most kids with these issues want to survive high school although i have to admit I would have liked to have been a cheerleader. The Olympics require the participant to be at least two years post op if I remember correctly and in High School that would or should be altered to require the child to be on at least blockers so testosterone will not kick in. If the child is not on blockers the MTF child will have a decided physical advantage over natal girls. Girls have participated in boys sports like golf for decades because girls are not as physically strong as boys so they are going up in competitive competition. I doubt this will become a big issue but if there is one thing I have learned it is there are enough douche-bags that someone might try and push it. Let us hope it is a none issue.


I tried to catch up with some of my favorite comedy blogs which are primarily the transvestites on T-central but I have noticed a decided somber mood on more than a few of them. It is rather sad to listen to some of these poor devils as they talk about dressing, dressing up, going out dressed up and how important their so-called feminine side is and sadly read as some of their lives dissolve around them as they lose their families when they announce to the world they are "transgender" and conveniently leave out the fact they are actually transvestites.

It is sad when these fools transition with no intention of SRS and then find it hard to change jobs or when they lose their jobs are lost and cannot understand why they cannot find a job. The really sad part is those of us that have worked as women after SRS early in life can explain the problem. Men will hire men before they will hire women in most skilled positions because they consider us inferior and I have seen that my entire life. They may hire you if you are pretty but sadly most of you are not but the simple truth is if you have no history working as a woman then how can they hire you for a job or position? You have never worked as a woman besides telling them you are "trans" is stupid to start with since it is none of their business.

The funny side of this is you are learning the trials and tribulations that we women have faced and fought through our entire lives. Now if you think they are reticent to hire women how reticent do you think they are to hire someone they perceive as a man in a dress? Is it fair or right?  Actually no it is not and I guess I understand why you all want to keep your current positions gained as men while now expressing yourself as a woman. Be forewarned sweetie if they downsize you get ready for a difficult time finding a position unless you can hide your past which I highly recommend.

I also found out that someone I actually like has decided they are going to transition and eventually have SRS and not once until they started therapy did this person EVER consider doing something like this. It seems the therapist convinced him he was transgender and should thus transition and get SRS. I have to wonder if this therapist has any clue because this man could start at Left Tackle for any NFL team and meet the height, weight, and arm length requirements with a little to spare. His family is already to dissolve around him and he cannot understand why. I fear this is a disaster waiting to happen and I am sad about that.






Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Get Your Freak On At The Expense Of Women

I really am trying to avoid the lunacy of the new political correctness associated with men "getting their freak on" in everyday life. I really have no issue with anyone enjoying their daily life in whatever manner they wish as long as they do not push it onto others that either find it offensive or even threatening. We had a another case a few days ago and I tried to avoid it but it really has irritated me once i discovered the truth.

You have probably read about the Leeds University incident where Alexis Lilith Starr a poor MTF transgender student was brutally assaulted and forced out of a ladies room by two women simply because she was transgendered.  On the face of it it sounds horrific and something most people would nor should support. Well, like most incidents involving the transgender activists it is important to keep both an open mind, sometimes they are right, and a skeptical mind, sometimes they are lying.

In the transgender world the victim, always transgender, is always correct and nobody and I repeat nobody ever investigates the truth and that includes the Montreal Gazette and Jillian Page who I do respect, Pink News in England whom I have little respect for, or The Leeds University student newspaper which obviously has not learned the concept of vetting ones sources and looking for background.

The one source I have found that actually does look for sources and information is Gender Trender the radical feminist blog that kind of hates me but at least they look behind the scenes.  The other thing that I do is never trust anyone and that includes Gender Trender and their sources so I do my own research.

Alexis Lilith Starr has a Facebook page that identifies him as protoman2050 and in this case I believe him is the appropriate pronoun as are all male pronouns. The following link from Leeds University student website section confirms the linkage.

As protoman2050 Alexis has posted on the Angels website and it is rather disturbing. He posted the following.


Male-to-androgyne here!
by Protoman2050 » Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:56 pm

Hi! I'm a male-to-androgyne, and I'm so thankful I found this forum.

Ever since I had puberty over a decade ago, I hated it. I hated the hair, the coarse skin, the sex drive, everything. I recently got done taking the COGIATI and Bem Gender Traits Test for Androgyny, and I have been classified as an androgyne. Which isn't really shocking to me, as I've always known that I was not male, yet I wasn't female, but somewhere in between. I like wearing female accessories with male clothing (my glasses are girl's frames, I often would wear my mom's leather jackets because I liked the style better than the ones I had, and I loved wearing some of my mom's sparkly jewelry), and other things like that. Yet it'd never cross my mind to dress or act fully female, so I guess I am a butch lesbian in a male body. 

Often people ask me if I'm flamboyantly gay because of these things, including occasionally my parents, and I know I'm not attracted to men in any way (which is probably why I detest my secondary sexual characteristics like body hair and things like that), yet I in no way wish to be a woman. So I'm not gay and I'm not transsexual, yet I'm not cisgendered. 

After I return from my summer vacation in my home of California, I plan on seeing my GP and asking for a referral to a psychiatrist for a proper gender identity evaluation. Good thing I attend the University of Leeds, as I'm right near Seacroft, where the GIS is.
Protoman2050
Apprentice Angel

Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:28 pm
Location: Leeds, UK/Long Beach, CA, USA


Mr Starr aka protoman2050 is pictured here as his most beautiful self.



Mr Starr or Douglas Pereira or protoman2050 is a 6-1 inch male and is no more transgendered or transsexual than a fence post.  The irony is none of these so called transgender activists ever so much as looked Mr Alexis Lilith Starr up. He is a man and despite this we women are supposedly required to guess at what gender he wants for the day just because he enters a ladies Room. This picture alone should be enough to insult any woman in existence because he is mocking women with this  appearance.

Mt Starr/Pereira  is supposedly someone that wants to be androgynous but by his own words does not want to be feminine in appearance which kind of defeats the purpose because I know a little about androgyny and you want a little bit of both so you can be either or neither. Mr Starr/Pereira likes his penis and intends to keep it so he can stand up and pee so why would he enter a Ladies Room where there are no urinals?

You can read other comments from this lifetime loser on the Gender Trender link above because some of it I cannot verify since I do not have a Facebook account and in all honesty and sick of these losers. The above picture is on one of the links I provided.

So Alexis identifies as a butch lesbian in a male body who likes and intends to keep his penis. Where have we read this before? where have we heard this before? yet despite this he claims he was misgendered.  What the heck are women supposed to do with some freak like this?  Walk up and ask what the heck pronouns they want used because you are obviously a totally fucked up male that scares the shit out of me?

Why doesn't this loon walk into the men's room? Because he would get the fucking shit kicked out of him or his fellow men would more than likely end up rolling on the floor in laughter. We women are required to support men when they get their freak on.  My question is why don't there fellow men support them first in their facilities because this dipshit does not want to be female in any way shape or form.

The real sad part about all of this is that the men that normally get their freak on at the expense of women usually rape us, murder us, capture and torture us, and are serial killers or some form of predator that finds women an easy target because they are men and insecure in their manhood and by their nature complete cowards. I seriously doubt this jackass is but the following statement is attributed to him.

“I’m more of a man than you will ever be, more of a woman than you can handle, and my damn click will break your jaw”.
By the way click is the new trans term for a combination clitoris and dick or click. Only a man could think that one up.

And we women are supposed to accept this piece of shit in our private spaces! I say bravo to the two women that pushed this piece of shit out of a Ladies room. In a rational world they would be heroines but in a man's world they are culprits for denying a man from getting his freak on.

Interesting times.




Friday, February 1, 2013

January 17, 1967 -- January 27, 1986 --- Feb 1, 2003

To those of us that worked in the arena they are the three dates that mark the three darkest days in NASA history and the worst part is none of the deaths should have happened. Seventeen lives were snuffed out because of arrogance, stupidity, career advancement, and poor management. It all started with the Apollo Pad 1 calamity.

Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee died from carbon monoxide poisoning and would have survived the burns if they could have gotten out. NASA had demanded North American, The Command Module Primary Contractor, provide an inward opening egress hatch because of an issue with Grissom's Liberty Bell 7 Mercury Flight when explosive bolts malfunctioned and the capsule sank while Grissom escaped.

I could spend hours telling you what we did wrong.  The Command Module was a disaster at this time. Necessary design changes made it impossible for the Simulators to be kept up to date which meant the Astronauts were training in something they would not fly in. This is never a good thing. The real culprit in the end was the pure oxygen atmosphere in the Capsule at 16.7 PSI which is above earth standard, the location of the venting mechanism to enable the hatch to be opened, and flammable Velcro material that had been put back "into" the capsule after being ordered out.

The worst part is some of us unfortunately watched them die on television.  They tried to get out but not even King Kong could have opened the inner hatch and there was no means of emergency egress. Grissom was so worried about the Command Module, at this time, he called it a lemon and took a picture with the capsule and a lemon.


Above is a staged photo by Grissom when he told NASA he was going to ask for help from a higher power.

The irony is we were rushing because we thought the Russians would beat us to the moon. There Chief Engineer Sergei Korolev was responsible for the design of all there equipment and was a brilliant Engineer.  We did not know he had died on January 14, 1966 from a botched surgery and many of us consider him the true father of practical astronautics. With his death the Russian program was dead because political hacks took over. I guess political quackery is universal because we had our share.

There was plenty of blame to go around on this one

 Challenger was at the minimum manslaughter. 7 NASA Astronauts died on a cold Florida morning when the external fuel tank exploded because of an o-ring on a solid fuel booster that leaked. Morton Thiokol  was the contractor that provide the solid booster with its supposedly flawed o-rings. Morton Thiokol was bent over and required to take one for the program by accepting blame for the disaster when it was not their fault. There was not a single thing wrong with the o-ring design.  The true flaw was NASA and its arrogance and over aggressive launch schedule despite known restrictions in there own  flight manual.

Now for the truth.

On launch day for our "teacher in space" it dawned bitterly cold in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Temperatures were in the upper 20's and icicles were hanging off the shuttle, its external boosters, and external tank. NASA's flight manual required all launches with air temperatures below 48 F to be held until the temperature was reached or canceled otherwise. Challenger was launched at 42 F in direct violation of there own manual.

Kennedy is a warm weather launch site and this plays into how certain components are designed. Morton Thiokol designed the o-rings for the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) for a warm weather launch at the specified minimum temperature of 48 F and this plays directly into the disaster.





On the far right hand side of this photo one can see a puff of gray smoke just after the solids were lit and the Shuttle was lifting off for STS-51-L. That was the first sign hot gases were leaking, but not the first time there had been a leak. That is a well kept secret maintained closely by NASA. On multiple previous "cold" launches below 48 F there had been an issue with the o-ring leakage and NASA was well aware of this.

Thiokol Engineers were so worried about the cold weather launches they told NASA there would be a catastrophic o-ring failure and the Shuttle would blow up. Thiokol engineers led by Roger Boisjoly  and four colleagues fought to stop the launch from Utah with Thiokol Management supporting them. Armed with the knowledge that Astronauts could die they fought with NASA and got the following response.

"I am appalled," said NASA's George Hardy, according to Boisjoly and our other source in the room. "I am appalled by your recommendation."
Another shuttle program manager, Lawrence Mulloy, didn't hide his disdain. "My God, Thiokol," he said. "When do you want me to launch — next April?"
More information can be found here.


Eventually NASA forced Thiokol Management to buckle and rescind the recommendation the the launch be scrubbed. Now for the truth about the o-ring design.

The o-ring design worked as long as launch parameters were maintained. The o-ring compound was a type of elasticized rubber and the compound design had to account for a wide range of temperatures and the minimum launch temperature was 48 F. Any launch below that temperature could be troublesome because like all rubber compounds the o-ring compound expanded and contracted based on its starting temperature "after" the solids were like and the hot gases were present.  The o-ring was redesigned after the accident but the compound still required a launch at a specific temperature or above despite the new design.

Essentially the NASA launch director at Kennedy threw his own book out the window and knowingly launched in a high risk scenario which was something NASA should never do.  First rule of manned space flight is Astronaut safety first and that means no out of parameter launches. In my humble opinion the launch director was at the minimum guilty of manslaughter but the first thing you learn in NASA is the blame game and NASA will only accept it when it is forced to, so Thiokol bent over, pulled down its pants, and took one in the booty for the program.

The other horrific part of the story they have been mum about was the death of the Astronauts. The Shuttle was built in 3 sections which included, Shuttle Engine plus Elevator and Rudder, Cargo Bay, and Crew Section. The explosion did not kill the Astronauts.  The Shock wave from the explosion separated the Crew Section from the Shuttle intact and most if not all the Astronauts died when the Crew Compartment slammed into the ocean.

The really sad part is NASA knew from day one what had happened but tried to place blame on both Thiokol and Martin Marietta who built the External tank. The Rogers Commission that investigated the disaster was as incompetent as NASA in its own way. Seven Astronauts died on that day 27 years ago and it should not have happened.

The Columbia disaster, in my humble opinion, is the most egregious of the 3. NASA knew they had damage to the Shuttle Wing and knows full well and structural flaw is exacerbated on reentry. The examined the Shuttle from afar yet never sent any of the qualified Astronauts on an EVA to examine possible wing damage. All NASA Shuttle flights carry the equipment and the qualified Astronauts for an EVA on every single flight.  It is a requirement for every mission.

Reentry is the most dangerous time for an mission into space. The vehicle slams into the upper atmosphere at 17,000 mph and the effect on what little atmosphere there is is spectacular. As the heat builds up the atmosphere liquefies into a molten plasma that literally flows off the surface of the vehicle not unlike molten lava flows. It is under immense pressure because of its size and surface area. The Shuttle reenters at well over 100 tons in mass at 17,000 mph and it is using the limited atmosphere to slow it down and it is very vulnerable. The ionization creates a radio blackout which makes everyone blind.

Plasma seeped into the wing and weakened the Shuttle structurally.  They were dead the minute they started reentry and never had a chance.  It was like playing Russian Roulette with a 38 and all 6 chambers loaded.

Rather than muck with the schedules of other Shuttle missions they decided to gamble and per usual the lives they lost were not their own but those willing to take the risk. One NASA official spokesman had the gall to say on both the NASA network and National TV that NASA did not worry about reentry and did not considered it dangerous. I really think that sums it all up but then I think about the wreckage.

There were people picking up pieces of the Columbia wreckage and it took NASA days to wake up to the simple fact a lot of it was extremely toxic because of the hypergolic fuels used for the RCS systems and starting the main Shuttle Engine plus other materials and liquids people should stay away from. Thankfully, to the best of my knowledge nobody was harmed by any wreckage but they could have. There was a reason NASA people wore Hazmat suits around found wreckage.

I am a proponent and supporter of manned space flight but I an not sure I trust NASA to manage it. They have never seen a budget they could not bloat nor have they missed many chances to be stupid like deciding they would not repair Hubble just because they did not want to and suddenly it was a risk.  It was a money grab. I would rather let the geeks at JPL run things but then that is a geek believing in other geeks.

Today is a day to remember all the heroes who died in both ours and the Russian Space Program. May their souls be at peace and may they all be remembered for being the bravest of the brave and the best sons and daughters of our planet Earth.

God bless them and their families.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

Trans Lunacy and Other Tidbits


The real problem with the trans activists is they are not supporting those that were born transsexual/transgender that want SRS.  They primarily support the cross-dressers that make up 97% of the people under the Transgender umbrella. In essence they support men-in-dresses with intact male genitalia in secure women's spaces. I do not and I was born transsexual.

I started the process when I was very young and it was a long time ago but all I wanted was to be the girl I should have been born. I did not want some special privileges as a "transwoman".  I considered myself cured after my SRS in early 1971 and never looked back.

I worked for 40+ years as a woman in a man's world and felt the sting of wage discrimination and I fought it when I could. I was asked multiple times, "why isn't a pretty girl like you home having children", and in so many ways I wish I could have born children but that was not to be. I fought my battles as a woman because nobody knew otherwise and to be honest that was all I ever wanted out of life.  I figured if I got that I could handle the rest of it. It is how we felt because being a girl was all it was ever about which was being who we really were. SRS was what was needed and we figured out a way to get it done and sometimes the methods were both morally and legally questionable but the end justified the means.

I was raped by a man when I was 14 so he could teach me what it meant to be a woman, like he had a freaking clue. These trans activists look at women from the outside looking in and are incapable of looking at life through the eyes of a woman because , quite bluntly, most of them want to retain their penis because it is their pleasure organ or to maintain their life style as it was before the transition. Changing from a men's business suit to a skirt does not make you either female or a woman unless you happen to be transgender.

They will tell us that a Colleen Francis in female spaces is not a threat because they look at it through male eyes, because they cannot do otherwise.  They cannot understand how frightened we can be with the thought of a functioning male in our midst because they do not see themselves as a threat, they are probably correct, but they are incapable of realizing it increases the chance that a predator can gain access by pretending to be a woman, as Colleen Francis did.  Francis was a functioning male and after he was caught he deleted Facebook accounts and other accounts where he expressed his desire to have sex with women using his current equipment while dressing as a woman.

They are offended when lesbians do not accept transwomen as fellow lesbians even thought they are functioning males with a working penis. That is transphobic. I am not a lesbian but I can imagine the shock and fear that would cause a lesbian who doesn't like the thought of a penis in the first place. You will notice you never read of them portraying men that cannot accept penis equipped transwomen as transphobic. Men have the right to reject that condition but women do not. Classic misogyny.

In so many ways the complaints and screams of outrage about depictions of "trans" people in the print media, on television, and in the movies is much ado about nothing. They work on the concept of trying to make something out of nothing in order to make society feel guilty as they try to make victims out of people that have in many cases victimized women by deceitfully marrying them and once they have them trapped in a marriage dropping the bombshell they are "trans" and expecting the wife to accept and support them. God help a wife, Christine Benvenuto, contradict her former husband's fantasy, Jay Ladin, because she will feel the wrath of the trans activist community. Soon the only villains allowed in television, movies, theater, or advertisement will be straight people.  How convenient.

American comedian and noted liberal Rosanne Barr was vilified and threatened when she said in a tweet that she supported those opposed to Colleen Francis having access to female spaces.  It was vicious  and threatening and personal.

They see themselves as martyrs fighting for "trans" rights when in truth they are men fighting to infringe on women's rights to safe and secure facilities. They love attaching "trans" to whatever they can. They want to be "special" and want to be identified as "transwoman" or "transman". They need "special" rights in addition to the rights of the gender they decide to be on a specific day. They have successfully blurred the concepts of sex and gender such that many do not realize they are distinctly different.

Their biggest ploy is the attempt to redefine what is male and female based on the concept that a female can have a  penis and a man can have a vagina and get pregnant as long as they claim said sex or gender. If they say it is so it is transphobic to deny it.

The one that really bugs me is the concept of cis gender privilege and the attempt to make genetic males and females feel guilty for being born that way based on a bizarre and long list of transgender problems primarily faced by those that have no intention of ever truly being male or female but are trying to redefine it so they fit. It goes hand in hand with the guilt those of us that were born transsexual and have managed to work hard to become complete women and men.  We are to feel guilty for passing because passing should not be promoted because some just cannot or never will pass.  I have sympathy for them if they want SRS but I have none for them if they do not because they are simply playing gender games and requiring us to go along with the fantasy.

These fools actually believe they can legislate acceptance by taking rights from women and giving them to men in dresses and any woman that objects is classified as transphobic.

The list of cis gender privileges found here is very interesting and very long. Some are the obstacles that anyone born transsexual must overcome to be free of transsexualism but those of us born that way and seeking our true life just dig in and plow through them.  We do not see them as female privilege but as our goals in life because we want to fit in and simply be women. The trans crowd does not want to fit in as female, they want it for free and nothing is free in life, unless of course you are trans and legislate it that way.

The other one that irritates me is feminism.  Just how the heck can a man in a dress, a Transwoman, be a feminist when they are violating the concept of what female is? To me they are misogynistic asshole men trying to force their fetish down the throats of women the same way they like to push something else down women's throats since they are almost all heterosexual males. When feminists said wait a freaking second here they invented the word "transfeminist" and of course this form of "feminism" fit their pathetic male world perfectly.  All of the things in life they felt made it difficult for them to play at being girls immediately made the list and of course, conveniently, the fact they were attempting to screw over women is ignored because after all they get to set the rules.

So in their myopic view of their "trans" world woman are privileged as are those of us that melted into society as woman after SRS and never let on about our past unless outed. What it means is simply being a girl/female/woman or a feminist is not "good" enough for the men in dresses, they need to be "transwomen" and "transfeminists"because they want the whole fucking world to know they were once "men". In the process it became important to usurp the transsexual experience by attempting to remove transsexual from use with the term transgender. The media is required to use transgender and even transsexual children are labeled transgender.

Now every transvestite on Transvestite-Central (T-Central) is transgendered and one can read about their lives as they destroy their families when their fetish becomes an obsession. Everything they know about being a woman is learned from reading about their fellow transvestites travails as they venture into the real world en femme. They are ecstatic when someone calls them she but fail to realize no person in their right mind would call a 6'-2" man in a dress much of anything unless they had more men backing them up but then if anything was said it would be "transphobic" because nobody has the right to simply say they look like Magilla Gorilla in a dress. The truth is we people that live in the world of the normal are too courteous or timid to say what should be said. I include myself in that category in public.

These idiots believe we, that live in the world of the normal, need teaching moments so we can learn these fetishistic men are just as much women as any woman living in the world of the normal. Just a little clue, we know who you are. We know you are a man in a dress. It is hard to miss the meaty hands, the size 14 hooves, the prevalent Adams Apple, or the male body plus they always have huge boobs because that is the ultimate male fantasy in the woman of their desire and that includes themselves.  I could go into how they dress but that is a post of its own.

Do any of us wish them any real harm? Not really. I often think forcing them to use the male facilities with their fellow men would be laughable but one would not want these poor little 6'-2" 225 pound delicate flowers put in danger, but then again they do not care if they pass legislation that puts us in potentially more danger.

That is the interesting question isn't it? Why is all the "trans" legislation for protection of male-bodied men in dresses. The reason is simple.  They will always be "trans" so they feel they need protection from us vile and predatory women that threaten them every day of their lives with rape, spousal abuse, murder, sexual harassment, and all the other mean things we do such as telling them they are men. Plus they are worried their male buddies might reject them as "gay" while they at the same time think they are somehow "lesbians".  I think that by itself shows you how screwed up they really are.

These same fools have perpetrated the "forced sterilization" hoax on the politically correct morons that are and always will be the Swedish. In their world forced sterilization is requiring someone to have a sex change in order to change documents. So in order for transvestites and others of their ilk to gain the right to claim they are either male or female, when they are no,t they categorized SRS as forced sterilization without regard to the harm it does to those truly born transsexual. In essence they were claiming that government funded SRS was forced sterilization and equating it to the eugenics programs of the Nazi's and their own Nazi leaning government of WWII plus the eugenics that was in effect into the 1970's.

More later.....

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

"Lost Girl" Kerfuffle was "Much Ado About Nothing"

I felt it necessary to update the "Lost Girl" scandal that the Transgender Mafia created and believe me they created a scandal out of nothing. Lost Girl is a SyFy show about supernatural creatures that live amongst us such as The Fae, the Succubus, Wolf Shifters and other non-human beings living together with humans. The main character Bo is a succubus who can literally suck the life force out of another being whether human or non-human.  Bo is depicted as a rather active bisexual creature with lesbian and male lovers.



The following are some of the complaints or accusations made against the Season Three premiere.


First article complaining with Goggle.

At the end of the episode, Bo kissed the prison's warden, who appears to be female -- and then announced that she had beard stubble, and was biologically male. The Amazon guards descended on the warden, grabbing her crotch and violently dragging her away. The warden survives the assault. She is referred to using male pronouns for the duration of the episode. 
Bo actually said "I knew that was a lot of stubble even for an amazon. (pause) Your leader (warden) is a man. She is a Liderc" The warden was impregnating girls in a scheme to sell the babies on the black market. The Warden was a mythical shape shifter called a Liderc. It was not discovered until the very end what was happening since the initial premise was the disappearance and then death of previous Doctor and Bo and Zoie Palmer the lesbian Doctor go undercover to find the truth. The woman second from the right is the Amazon Warden who is the Liderc.

There is not a single negative connotation towards the transgendered, the transsexual, or the gender diverse in the entire show. I guess the penis packing men in dresses might be upset because another Amazon walked up and did a crotch inspection with a grab and the last we see of our Liderc Warden and great offense to the Transgender world she is led away by the mob of pissed off women she has dehumanized in prison.

Some of these dipshits were even upset because the part was played by a female actress which presumably might have made the resulting exposure more palatable, possibly. I watched the show on Demand and re-ran the exposure moment and it is neither derogatory nor offensive to anyone and is correctly gendered throughout the show even at the end.

This was a classic GLAAD grab for attention and your typical Transgender attempt to gain publicity over nothing. Anyone offended by that episode is seriously deluded and grasping at straws that do not exist, yet, in this world of political correctness they managed to get a sortof apology from the show.

Isn't it humorous they find that offensive yet these same people feel Colleen Francis has the right to expose his male genitals to women just because he claims he is transgendered.  Did anyone read anywhere where GLAAD took a position on that asshole? Not that I know of.

This entire kerfuffle was manufactured and one has to ask the question why? At one time I was a fan of the SciFi channel but the SyFy channel has few good shows and I don't watch any of them. I did watch this show when it first came on but its characters were boring and the issues were repetitive and the characters so limited it seemed to me the only way they could get viewer interest is with the bisexual lead characters sex life which is seemingly a major part of every script. They get the lesbians with the lesbian kisses and they get the men that just love the thought of girl-on-girl action. 

I wonder if flagging ratings was a part of this manufactured stupidity.  It would not be the first time and I do believe the SyFy channel needs all the ratings help it can get.  We all know how blindly these buffoons in the Transgender Mafia will lock onto any perceived slight. Well it worked, I guess, because it got me to watch that episode but it was a one timer for me.

I am willing to wager that most of the nimrod transgender activists complaining have not seen the show and believe me if you were not listening closely it was very difficult to even here the supposed transgender slight. Just another classic example of the saying, "Stupid is what stupid does".

Monday, January 21, 2013

Threats of Censorship

Censorship is afoot in the blog world when it comes to any comments in reference to the transgendered.  You either agree with the transgender paradigm or you must be silenced. They even consider some comments about women and transsexuals as an affront yet in most cases they want the term transsexual erased. One must never let anyone say anything that contradicts the message they are trying to push onto the world.

Now I am certainly not a friend of the Radfems that think my life is a lie and that I am not a woman even though they wouldn't know I was born a boy unless I told them.  Most if these radical feminists are lesbians that are truly afraid of the male-bodied transgenders passing themselves off as women while maintaining a functional penis. In my opinion these radical feminists are missing the simple fact that most people truly born transsexual that have cured themselves or are on the way to curing themselves are likely to agree with them on the lesbians with penis' argument but like most fringe groups they are a little too myopic.

The blog called Gender Trender has been censored after a concerted effort by the trans activist twittersphere     for some reasons that escape me based on what I have read. Access to the blog has been denied to the owner at least temporarily. I am not a fan of censorship although I have resorted to banning one individual from commenting on my blog mainly because her comments are not about the post but an attack on me so I guess I do censor her but I do let them through if she is not her normal offensive self. There is another one I should ban but she still has a little more rope.

In a comment on my previous post a commenter, Black Swan, has made an attempt to threaten me with certain types of harassment in an attempt to censor what I write here which is just the opinion of someone that has lived too much and seen these same idiots in other forms and likes to rattle their collective cages a little. Black Swan is a third rate paralegal and mentioned harassing me with a law 47 USCS 230 which does not apply and with a SLAPP legal action which I explained in a comment on the previous post which is strictly a harassment technique which is done by state and must be filed in the resident state of the defendant's legal residence.

You realize you must be hitting a nerve when the transgender mafia has one of their followers and practitioners threaten you thusly. She even brought out the racist card which is beyond hilarious based on my history and life but then again they throw racist, nazi, transphobic, etc. against anyone that stands up to them. They believe any attempt to censor Christine Benvenuto is legitimate and the taking down of literature or arguments that contradict their beliefs in any way is a "right" and in essence support burning books and denying access to contrarian views because they consider said views anti trans. They can stand heel to heel with the right wing nuts that want to censor or deny access to books like "Catcher in the Rye" and even "The Origin of The Species" by Darwin because in their myopic world they see anyone speaking contrary to their stated beliefs is a heretic. They act more like the Catholic Church than the Catholic Church and more like the Right Wing nuts than the Right Wing Nuts. That is not good company..

The transgender mafia is getting more bold and more arrogant as they have succeeded in there censorship attempts in several instances and I know of several blogs that were closed down because they were threatened with being outed. Black Swan threatened to out me in her comment on the previous post. Anything to silence the critics.

Just another example of men being men!!!!




Thursday, January 17, 2013

The TG Political Correctness Stupidity

In the minds of the TG activists no television show, radio program or paper has the right to print or discuss or show anything that promotes a negative stereotype of the transgendered. In their world Michelle Kosilek the wife murderer is a martyr and deserves to have her sex change at the taxpayers expense after "he" suddenly decided in jail he was a she. Before jail he was your average transvestite murderer but that is not allowed.

A show on the SyFy channel called "Lost Girl" had as its opening show for this season a transgender character that was pretending to be a female guard in a prison in order to impregnate women. Now this show in my humble opinion went downhill and has gone downhill since the first season yet the transgender advocates are up in arms over it calling it transphobic. I gather one cannot have a single negative impression about the transgendered. By these standards Michael Caine's critically acclaimed movie "Dressed to Kill" could not be made nor could Jodie Foster's "Silence of the Lambs".

I guess only heterosexual characters can be evil and twisted. If a book is authored that contradicts the fantasy of a self aggrandizing late transitioner it should be censored and shouted down at any public reading. If some dipshit makes a comment implying transsexuals should stop trying to look like Brazilian Transsexuals it is a sacrilege. Rather than simply laughing it off as a stupid comment made by someone that might possibly be clueless they engage in a verbal confrontation and eventually get the article censored.  To the TG advocates it is their way or the censorship highway.

Look what happened to Rosanne Barr, a major left wing icon, when she sided with those of us that thought male bodied individuals should stay out of women's changing areas, lockers etc.. She was savaged by the political correctness police of the transgender mafia. It was downright vicious.

Any article in any paper or on any blog that contradicts their myopic view of the world is to be censored, shut down and vilified. They ignore the facts in cases and promote the bullshit and the propaganda. In most cases they are simply too stupid to even research the facts because after all they already know everything even if they have not read the facts. The current situation in Sweden is a rather sinister example of this.  Headlines scream that Sweden has been sterilizing the transgendered for years.  What they conveniently leave out is the sterilization is the Sex Reassignment Surgery that was required in order to get documentation papers changed from male to female and since the state paid for it, those were the rules. Sweden never forcibly sterilized anyone for being transsexual or transgendered but that would not rally the troops. They even tried linking it to eugenics which were actually used by Sweden on some people similar to what the German's did in WWII.

All this goes with the never let the facts influence the story when it might benefit men in retaining their dicks. We have these loons demanding that male bodied individuals in female attire be legally allowed into restricted use facilities for women. They claim they are no threat and affirm Colleen Francis' right to expose herself in a women's sauna. They are very willing to trample on a women's right to privacy and our security when in compromising positions. They claim it is transphobic to deny these male bodied men anything their little male hearts desire while wearing the little wife's dress.

This is not an issue for those of us born transsexual who have undergone SRS to correct mother nature's mistake or for those born transsexual working toward SRS.  Not one of us would ever consider entering a woman's dressing area before SRS unless the circumstances were unavoidable and we would certainly not expose ourselves because quite simply few of us were or are in love with what we were born with.

Their big claim is that the transgendered are not a threat to women but this is just not true if they are male bodied. Michelle Kosilek murdered his wife in cold blood and stuffed her in the trunk of her car and it was because he was a transvestite and the wife got in his way.  The first thing he did was go on a clothes buying spree once she was out of the way. I could be wrong but he might actually have been arrested buying female clothes or exiting a store with female attire.  Is that dangerous enough for you?

We now have another possible case of a transgender individual murdering a woman. Here is the link in the
Torrance Daily Breeze. Now I believe the political correctness police of the TG mafia have missed something.  They reference "her" as a "transgender man" and that should be "transgender woman" and isn't it politically incorrect to mention this until this scumbag is convicted and sent to prison for life. Heck they can then demand"she" be given a free sex change by the State of California.

Now in the United States one is innocent until proven guilty so I'll try and keep an eye on this story. Angel Guevara Bello is the suspect but the TG police are missing a chance to correct a newspaper. Bello asked to be referred to as a female yet the newspaper consistently used male pronouns despite the obvious breasts the accused had. Ms. Bello is a she-male prostitute so the male package was working because that is a requirement and the victim was found under a bush and may have been sexually assaulted. The police seem to have significant evidence but then one is innocent until proven guilty unless one is transgender and then of course they are always innocent.

I am waiting for the transgender mafia and the political correctness police to demand that male bodied transgenders be allowed to compete in the Miss America pageant because after all SRS is forced sterilization  and any requirement of SRS is thus some form of transphobia. The stupid thing is they literally do have the balls to demand this and probably will.  After all if the birth certificate says female then cock and balls or not you are female in their world.

Welcome to the new world order but a barf bag might be required.