NCAA has Interesting Transgender Policy

The International Olympic Committee has a policy  that allows participation for both MTF or FTM post-operative individuals. The United States Golf Association has a similar policy that allows participation although both require disclosure. Both institutions require SRS and at least two years of provable hormone treatment post surgery.

Now we come to the National Collegiate Athletic Association and its policy involving MTF and FTM "transgender students and I would say they have crossed the line of common sense. This is what the policy is.

• A trans male (female to male) student-athlete who has received a medical exception for treatment with testosterone for gender transition may compete on a men’s team but is no longer eligible to compete on a women’s team without changing the team status to a mixed team.   A mixed team is eligible only for men’s championships.
• A trans female (male to female) student-athlete being treated with testosterone suppression medication for gender transition may continue to compete on a men’s team but may not compete on a women’s team without changing it to a mixed team status until completing one calendar year of documented testosterone-suppression treatment.

Development of the new policies was aided in part by a report from the National Center on Lesbian Rights and the Women’s Sports Foundation last October that provided guidance on how colleges and universities should accommodate the interests of student-athletes who have transitioned or are transitioning from one gender to another.

Co-authored by the National Center for Lesbian Rights’ Director of the Sports Project Helen Carroll and GLESN (Gay, Lesbian dn Straight Education Network) project director Pat Griffin, who has overseen educational efforts for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues in sports for the Women’s Sports Foundation, the report stresses that any transgender student-athlete “should be allowed to participate in any gender-segregated sports activity so long as that athlete’s use of hormone therapy, if any, is consistent with the national governing body’s existing policies on banned medications.”

 Mothers and fathers beware but a male with a penis may soon be playing sports as a girl with your gifted young daughters whether you like it or not. One year on testosterone blockers is insufficient considering the process for the two organizations mentioned above require approx 4 years given pre SRS treatment.

It takes considerably longer for a college age MTF individual to lose their strength and maleness than one year on blockers. It is the estrogen that feminizes the male and causes the softening of the body yet this is ABSOLUTELY not a requirement. One year on blockers and Michael Spitz could be on your female swim team. Lord how compelling that is.

Just think about basketball. One year on blockers and the all-world freshman sensation Anthony Davis could play for the Kentucky Women's program.  What chance would the incredible Brittney Griner have against Ms. Davis.  I am not suggesting this as a possibility because Mr Davis is about to be the #1 pick in the NBA draft and is certainly not transgender.

Now this would surely have been an option for Lindsey Walker The World's Tallest Transsexual who played college basketball as a man.  I am sure Lindsey would have been a superstar as a collegiate female basketball player with only one year on blockers. I am sure it is highly unpleasant being a 7 foot transsexual and I certainly feel for Lindsey and support her but her on one year of blockers would make Brittney Griner look like a nothing because men have good verticals and most women do not.  In fact Brittney has difficulty dunking although she can.  I doubt Lindsey has trouble or had trouble dunking in college.

The real question is why would the NCAA do this and what the fuck were they thinking when one considers the Olympic position which is reasonable and proper? You can tell just by the wording. The IOC uses transsexual and the NCAA uses trans and transgender and reading farther down one can see who had the influence.

The question I have is how do you handle the locker room when one player is physically male and the others are female? Another question is would a collegiate coach in a female sport actually recruit and play someone like this? I do not believe they would but if they have open tryouts, most do, they would be hard pressed to deny a Lindsey Walker as a basketball player.  If the NCAA followed the OIC and the USGA conditions I would support the NCAA but I cannot and I realize I am just a pimple on life's ass but I will have my say.

Personally I believe there would be outrage and a horrible backlash even if the kid had followed the IOC protocol because the transgender have so clouded what is and what is not female people would be scared. If someone tried to play using the current NCAA protocol I am sure opponents would be outraged and I am sure any girl that possibly lost a scholarship to a man in a dress would be really pissed off.

It has always been tough for women's sports in college and women were discriminated against openly until Prop 9 came into being. Now it seems men that are still men physically want to invade women's sports in college. I have two granddaughters that are very athletic and headed to college and will play sports.  I would be outraged if the above happened and I cannot see how other parents would be outraged. It would be worse if they gave the individual a scholarship currently set aside for a girl.

I really doubt a transsexual would get involved with this but I could be wrong. I am sure eventually some transgender nitwit will do it and when that day comes there will be a big backlash. It is not the same for a FTM because the strength advantage goes to men but it is and always will be a strength advantage for a MTF if there time on blockers and even estrogen is short term. If they work out the muscle mass will not dissipate quickly.  Eventually they will be similar to women but not for quite a while.

The world has gone crazy.  Now our daughters will have to play men in sports and support them as female when they are not. O will watch with great interest for the first case that tests this ruling by the NCAA which has again shown it is per usual out of touch with reality.

Castration required at Pitt??

First we had forced sterilization in Sweden and now the University of Pittsburgh is requiring "castration" for trans students. I do wish the Transgender Borg would get it correct but then being honest and above board or pray tell being truthful is not something the Transgender Borg has either a commitment to do nor a willing to attempt.

A little history is needed. This problem at Pitt has been in the trans news for a while. This was taken from the blog TransGriot which is run by Monica Roberts of 7 inch clitoris fame or I like my penis and am keeping it but I am still a female and a women and "real men" like my 7 inch clit.

Last month the Pitt Anti-Discrimination Policies committee, one of the standing advisory committees of the University Senate, unanimously passed a resolution that would allow students to use bathrooms allocated to the gender they identify with, not their birth one. .The ADP committee includes Pitt faculty, staff and two Pitt students who do not have voting power: Board member Julie Halinan and Rainbow Alliance President Tricia Dougherty.  .  

On Tuesday an unidentified Pitt spokesperson stated that students must use the gendered facilities that correspond with gender on their birth certificate, not how they currently present.

It was not just bathrooms that were opened to transgendered students.  It was all female facilities including public shower areas, locker rooms etc..  Admittedly I really doubt anyone would shower with girls while having a penis but who knows.  In this Pitt News article the University clearly states it is "gender facilities" and not just bathrooms.

The University of Pittsburgh has the following makeup.

29,000 students

18,500 undergrad and 10,500 graduate

4807 academic staff

Based purely on statistics considering there are 35,000 people involved with Pitt and of those maybe 10 students that are  transsexual. Purely based on a statistical model using the higher number of 1 in 3000.  How many are transgender or purely transvestites is of course higher based on pure numbers.

For a University to take such a stance is highly unusual since they are bastions of liberalism and political correctness and Pitt is no exception. One of my friends from college is a Professor at Pitt. A Pitt transgender student said the following.

Alice Haas, a junior transgender student, also didn’t react positively to Pitt’s gendered-facility policy. Haas identifies as a female.

“I find it absolutely barbaric and appalling that the University of Pittsburgh requires forced castration in order for me to be considered female, especially when my driver’s license and passport both state otherwise,” Haas said. “It is in no way just or appropriate to force me to provide information on my genitals or my birth certificate.”

So I guess the new transgender position is that SRS is forced castration while a man in a dress with a penis is a female because this asshole managed to fool the Registry of Motor Vehicles and the US State Department.

The following article  explains the University position which is they handle student issues such as this on a case by case basis. This seems to be a rational and reasonable solution rather than a blanket policy that allows those with a penis to shower in public with other women which is what Ms. Haas seems to want to do.

The irony here is the University goes out of its way to accommodate transsexual students and will provide special housing and help them during their college life but draws the line a blanket acceptance of all those claiming to be female. The position of birth certificate requirement was a response to the blanket demands of the transgender activists. Unlike most in the transgender community transsexuals in general want privacy and confidentiality in regards to their condition and Pitt will help with that as my University did 50 years ago.

Another irony is they can call SRS castration at Pitt or forced sterilization in Sweden and demean all of us that have taken that path but that is not bigotry but those of us that say a transvestite in a dress is not a female are bigots. It seems to me like we have the common sense approach and the transgender have an off the wall asinine view of the world.

My college friend who is a Professor at Pitt was taken back that I supported the University because they thought I would understand. Well, I do understand what transsexual kids need and Pitt will help them or would and I am hopeful they still do but fear the backlash to the transgender bullshit could hurt kids that are truly transsexual.  No person truly transsexual would ever use the term castration for SRS.


I do believe Pitt will still help on a case by case basis but this critical change in policy was brought about by something other than bigotry as the transgender love to throw out there every chance they get. It is only bigotry and hate if their views and opinions are opposed but it is not bigoty or hate regardless of what they say because they are the Borg and assimilation is inevitable.

Learning To Let Go of the Past

I was watching a movie this evening. It was called "We Bought A Zoo" with Matt Damon but what the movie is really about is learning to let go or to learn to deal with the aftermath of tragedy in your life.

It has been six years since my husband died and I have had chronic insomnia since.  Funny thing is I had it from the day my first marriage blew up until the day I met my second husband. It really hit me very hard because I have had a very difficult time letting go of him. I have tried but I cannot.  I dated and compared them to him and they failed miserably which was so unfair to them.

It got me thinking about those of us born transsexual and the differences between those of us that have taken advantage of modern medicine and been cured through hormones and SRS. I remember how angry I was as a child because I did not understand why people did not listen to me when I told them I was a girl. The world has a tendency to be black and white when you are a kid. It takes life and the pain and joy it can bring to learn about shades of gray.

Kids look being transsexual in a black and white manner. I am a girl but I guess I am not so just let me be a girl because I am not hurting anyone. I think I uttered those words daily because it seemed simple to me and this was before I ever met Dr. Benjamin. Unfortunately learning I was transsexual, starting hormones and learning about what it meant began to bring shades of gray.

I remember when I started pushing appearance boundaries when I was 10-11. It shocked my poor mother and I learned the cardinal rule of rebellion which is push it over the edge and negotiate back a little.  They will think they are winning because you cut your nails a bit or let you hair be trimmed a bit or stopped dressing too femininely. I learned about gray areas when I came back from Canada the first time. I received an instant lesson in compromise and gray areas when I met Harry. It is just not that easy being transsexual after you learn you are transsexual.

Having a boyfriend makes a kid like me learn quickly about life. When he died in Southeast Asia I did not handle it well and I actually understand why they were worried and put me into a private Hospital. What happened after the Private Hospital panicked and sent me to  the deviant sex wing of a State Facility is what nightmares are made of. I still have the picture of that German in my head to this day and I am convinced I would have killed him if I had the chance then.

It was very hard letting go of that boy. He was the first to accept me and the first to understand me outside of my family. Maybe it was a childhood love but it was more than that for me.

The irony of all this is simple.  The one thing I had no trouble doing was letting go of the fact I was once transsexual. Those of us that have lived a life out of the spotlight are often accused of "forgetting where we came from" and my only response is "why would I want to dwell on it". Just being a girl was enough to make life exceptionally cool. There is something  just so normal in being a mom, raising a daughter, taking her to school and picking her up, attending PTA meetings, and getting divorced young.

The only time anything transsexual came up was when we helped kids. Life was boringly normal and typically American for a woman my age. When the Internet became viable commercially I would venture on and find my way to an irc chat or something like that but leave quickly.  Curiosity killed the cat is an old saying and in my case curiosity made me sick.

I walked away from my past because it allowed me to be the girl I knew I was. I let go of it because being transsexual is a lead weight around your life and being a professional transsexual is not something I would ever consider.  I realize some choose that path and I will not understand why but I can respect the fact it is their personal decision. It is hard enough being a woman in this modern world but being labeled a "transsexual" woman is a burden I personally would not want.

The problem with the Transgender Borg is they demand that everyone must not let go of their past. They are quite comfortable with that because they will always be cross-dressers or transvestites or trans-whatever. They can never let go of the past because their past is both the present and their future and whether they will admit it nor not they want us to just as miserable as they are.

They can let go of nothing because it is what they are.  They are defined by transgender and those of us that are now cured/complete are just simply the correct sex we should have been born and are defined by that and the lives we lead.

I am not sure if I can ever let go of what my first husband did to me. It was both dishonest and hurtful and he has been an ongoing pain in my ass.  I do not truly hate him because he is the biological father of my stepdaughter but despite not being physically abusive he has certainly been verbally abusive, financially devastating while married, and

No transsexual owes a damn thing to the Transgender Borg and in truth that is what they desire.  They want you to never let go of your past so you will feel just as pathetic and miserable as they do and thus support transvestite civil rights. When someone defines what civil rights these men deserve other than those associated with their male brethren then maybe I will listen.

Traitors to us All

The sad thing about transsexuals that support the Transgender Borg and their position and claims for "equal" rights is the issue of the harm it causes those truly born transsexual. Lets just put it out there the way I feel about this.

If you support the transgender and their positions and you were born transsexual then you are a traitor to those you sometimes claim as sisters and brothers. You are a traitor because you support transvestites and cross-dressers and make the invalid attempt to claim we are alike and have similar needs for legal protection but you miss the most cogent problem with your position.

Because the transgender crowd want the word transsexual placed in the same category as tranny, faggot, and the n-word they are attempting to destroy something every transsexual should support. You traitors are destroying the chance for transsexualism to be designated as a medical condition and believe me that is something the transgender crowd wants to prevent at all costs.

The simple truth is if a condition can be corrected by medical intervention using hormones and  surgery then it is a medical condition. I certainly believe that is true of transsexualism and Harry Benjamin believed that also. Those in the transgendered community have no such options.  They do not consider their condition a hindrance because it is a condition that provides both pleasure and gratification and if offered a cure they would refuse it. I know if I could press a button and not one single child would ever again be born transsexual then I would.

You will never read anyone supporting transgender causes asserting or allowing us to assert we are just women after SRS because it invalidates them. We are Trans-women, transgender woman, etc. but we are always labeled with something trans by the Borg. The reason is quite simple. They will always be trans something and they need us to be labeled as such otherwise we are not linked. Look at how Jenna Talackova is labeled as a transgender woman despite stating she was "a woman with a history" which is how some of us say it.

The other reason they do not want us labeled as just women or men after surgery is because it implies we are  just women or men which means normal for all extensive purposes. Being normal was what I wanted and that was what I was after SRS.  I was just a normal woman. They can never be normal and really do not want to be normal.  They prefer to be "special" and receive "special" privileges because they are special.  Just ask them. They need laws to prevent those mean women from beating those poor men up when they enter women's spaces. Look at all the cases where we women rape and murder those poor men in dresses. We are vile sirens intent of spoiling their fantasies unless the local Dominatrix shows up early.

They will attempt to destroy this idea by claiming we are elitist scum because not everyone can afford SRS.  This may be true but that does not mean they cannot eventually get surgery by actually working for it like most of us did.  I was disowned by my family or probably more accurately I disowned them and I know what being poor is and what being affluent is and I will take affluent every time but when I was poor I worked my ass off. It took me over a year to pay back what I owed just to people that saved me from being homeless when I started in Houston.  Just a little clue for those that are afraid of work. They do not advance you money on a government position even if you are very important to its success.

I did something that almost killed me.  I worked as a sort of boy for 3 1/2 years because I needed the money and it hurt but I did it because you do what is required to get healthy when you consider what you suffer from a medical condition. I never ever wanted to be transsexual. I was just a girl that needed some corrective surgery for a birth defect. I cried myself to sleep every night because it was like going back to my childhood and it was painful but I did  it and many more like me did it and are doing it.

Yes I was lucky I did not have to do sex work but several of my friends did but they did it for the money to get SRS.  If you are truly transsexual your primary goal is SRS in almost all but the rarest of cases. If you are transgender then your primary goal in life is more likely sexual gratification from dressing and playing girl because there is no cure for what you have and there never will be and therein lies the reasoning behind the need to destroy any medical designation for transsexualism.

We that have had SRS can never belong to the Transgender Borg because we are not trans anything but they want everyone including us to believe otherwise. We just want to be women and earn our way as women while they want to be declared women because they say they are but they also want to keep the jobs and positions they have earned as men probably at the expense of and on the backs of women. These men are really the ones of privilege because all of us women understand being a man is more beneficial than being a woman but if you can keep your male gotten gains and play girl you get the best of both worlds. I fought discrimination as a woman for 42+ years until the day I retired.



The real war on women is not from the Conservatives that are against abortion because they will never win that fight. The real war against women is from the men controlling the Transgender Borg. They want to take away the basic human rights we women have from the simple right to have our own bathrooms and women's spaces to the more fundamental issue of attempting to redefine what female means so transvestites and cross-dressers can claim femaleness in their spare time and keep their maleness for work. The irony of this is these idiots all identify as liberals because they assume quite correctly that in order to get votes the democrats will support anything as long as they can hide its true meaning and as a lifelong democrat I find it reprehensible.

If they get their way we women will be number three on the human species pecking order. It will be men, she-men, and then women because why would you want to actually be a woman when you can play girl and go back to being a man for the important things like work and sex.

Let the name calling by our enemies begin but just remember we have something they will never have.  We are women. We are comfortable as women. We are normal and they will always be perverts and fetishistic men in need of a good whipping or some forced feminizing from some Dominatrix. I wonder where that genus Cygnus went?

Are hormones and 24/7 365 enough?

This is an interesting concept. If someone starts hormones and transitions and lives 24/7 365 days a year as a woman are they truly women? Basically is this enough? This question was posed by someone on another blog in reference to comments made about a guest post made by one calling themselves Sable on her blog and possibly on my blog. As long as the person has not previously self identified as a transvestite I would have to qualify them as transsexual.

Qualifying as transsexual does not automatically qualify you as a woman (MTF). All it qualifies one for is the label of transsexual and hopefully the path to their freedom through surgery. This may or may not be a minor position change for me but in order to be true to Harry I must allow for this situation. Some transsexuals may not want surgery but what this does is qualify them as transsexual forever since they have not become the other sex. They can never be qualified as female because they have male parts. It may seem cruel to some but this is a line that needs to be drawn in my opinion.

The problem I see for these non-op transsexuals is they are transsexuals for life. How can they assimilate into life as women when they are hindered my still owning their male bits? This is where the issues involving those of us that had SRS and consider ourselves "just" women and those that made a conscious decision not to have surgery come about. The claimants, non-op transsexuals, protest and state they are the same as us and thus women "because" they were born transsexual as we were.

In order to be a woman one can no longer be transsexual since by its very definition it implies we believe we belong to the opposite sex whether it is from total psycho sexual inversion or the proverbial woman trapped in a man's body.  It implies the changing of ones sex by definition or certainly by meaning.  Those that adhere to the process become women.  Those that deny the process whether by decision or for financial or medical reasoning will always be transsexual. Once surgery is completed the  transsexual condition no longer in in existence.

Now what has happened is the non-op transsexuals have joined forces with the Transgender Borg and have attempted to coerce all transsexuals to accept the transgender umbrella. Assimilation is not an option just like the Star Trek Borg stated. It is good for the whole which are the one. That even includes those of us that have gotten on with our lives and are just another woman in society. I always thought that was the goal of all transsexuals but I guess not. They not only want to assimilate transsexuals they want to force us to be considered transsexual for our entire lives just like them.

It seems the assimilation means we no longer are allowed to be true to ourselves and just be women. The irony of this position is exacerbated by the opinions of some that we have forgotten where we came from which is pathetic when coming from some 62 year old man that just started hormones and transitioned after being a transvestite his entire life. The real problem is these assholes have absolutely zero idea what it was like for kids like me because they never lived it.  They imagined it in their minds because if they had lived what I lived through they would not have made it to a late life transition and they would never have married a woman. In actuality we are like night and day or apples and oranges. I existed to be a woman. They existed to be transsexual. Big, very big difference.

I am also pragmatic about my life as a woman. I knew it would be difficult to find a man that could love me for the woman I am. I also cannot hold it against those that cannot.  The men that have truly loved me always thought of me as a girl or woman even if I was attempting boy badly and they witnessed it. It is what I am and always was, a girl, a woman.

I would never try and force myself onto men demanding they accept me.  They either would or would not accept me. You cannot demand acceptance and it is as much fear and disbelief as it is anything. The only man I told that had a bad reaction was Enrique and it was ugly and it was hurtful and it was my fault because I was afraid to tell him and he found out. Later in life we became friends again and he said he was so shocked and in such disbelief he felt betrayed and that was my fault. I never felt I was a complete woman until after SRS.

This is one of the reason I have a very difficult time with these non-op trans lesbians making such a stink because natal born lesbians reject them because they have a penis. What do they expect to happen? Do they honestly expect they will be accepted by other than the rare few, if any? They claim these lesbians are transphobic and denying their gender identity. I see it as lesbian woman demanding their right to only have a lesbian sex partner than is actually physically female.

Why is it we heterosexual women do not scream the same thing about men that refuse to accept us. Maybe it is because we really are women and those "male" lesbians are still just plain men. Men do not like to be denied their little fantasies and as lesbians should know men seem to love lesbians. I always find it humorous when one of these nimrods claims it will not be a sexual relationship.  Funny thing is my lesbian friends think all their relationships are sexual, at least at first. After all why do we date. Okay, I did like the free dinners and movies and admit it.

The is nothing worse than a man that has been scorned and denied his fantasy. Infantile reactions are what come to mind. I would find it interesting for some lesbian packing male bits to explain to me  how this lesbian sexual relationship would work when one has a penis and the other a vagina.  Last time I checked I think that is defined as heterosexual sex but this is a weird new world we live in. I cannot imagine the utter shock a lesbian would endure if they went to bed with what they perceived as a lesbian and found them packing a penis. Now that would be an interesting "Crying Game" moment.

I will attempt to be more understanding of non-op transsexuals but there is a limit to that understanding.

Way to go Jenna Talackova

In a news conference televised on CNN found here Jenna talks about the decision of the Miss Universe Pageant and I have to commend this young lady since she seems to really get it.

Again she stated simply, "I am a woman", which is what she is.  She is not a trans-woman, a transgender woman, nor a transsexual woman. She was cured when she had her SRS and is simply a woman. How refreshing to here her call herself transgender, transsexual or trans anything because she is none of those.

Hopefully she will not be corrupted by the groping hands of the transgender loons and will remain steadfast in her opinion that she is simply "a woman".

Jenna Talackova will be allowed to compete

Well maybe there is justice after all. Jenna Talackova is now allowed to compete for the Miss Canada portion of the Miss Universe contest. GLAAD is trying to lay claim to providing the impetus for this decision but I have a feeling Mr. Trump was not influenced by GLAAD but they along with many others including people like Bill O'Reilly who openly supported her had as much input.  Trump and O'Reilly are close but who knows.

Of course all the transgender dispshits are now crowing that transgender women can compete but they of course miss the relevant point that the contestant must have had SRS.  I am not sure how well "male junk" would go over in the bikini section of the contest.

The simple truth is only women can compete and Jenna is a woman who happened to be born transsexual but has been cured. I am sure we will be reading how requiring SRS for a contestant is forced sterilization to transphobic because it discriminates against women that still have their male bits. It will also be discriminatory against those MTF transgender that are too poor to afford surgery and the list will go on and on.

The simple truth is GLAAD does not represent transsexuals nor most transgendered either.  They represent Gays and Lesbians and know little to nothing about what it means to be transsexual since they deal primarily with the fuckwits in the Transgender Borg like Autumn Sandeen and her ilk. If a transsexual happens to be either gay or lesbian then GLAAD represents them. In fact GLAAD states the word transsexual should not be used ever.  The correct term is transgender.  How fucking convenient.

Expect ever "trans*" asshole in the blog world to be attaching themselves firmly to Ms. Talackova's ass as the contest nears. It may even be "transphobic" if she does not win. What not one of these assholes really understands is Jenna has already won.  She has won because they have accepted her as a woman even with a little history. Funny, but isn't that what all MTF transsexuals want?  Acceptance as a woman. There is no better feeling.

Way to go Jenna.